And this was in the news June 30, 2012.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8324569/NHS-shamed-over-callous-treatment-of-elderly.html

NHS shamed over callous treatment of elderly

The National Health Service is today condemned over its inhumane treatment of elderly patients in an official report that finds hospitals are failing to meet “even the most basic standards of care” for the over-65s.

By Martin Beckford, Health Correspondent
10:43PM GMT 14 Feb 2011
432 Comments
A study of pensioners who suffered appalling treatment at the hands of doctors and nurses says that half were not given enough to eat or drink. One family member said the maltreatment amounted to “euthanasia”.
Some were left unwashed or in soiled clothes, while others were forgotten after being sent home or given the wrong medication.
In several cases considered by the Health Service Ombudsman, patients died without loved ones by their sides because of the “casual indifference” of staff and their “bewildering disregard” for people’s needs.
The damning report warns that extra money will not help the NHS meet required standards of care and that more problems are likely as the population ages.
Ann Abraham, who as health ombudsman carries out independent investigation of complaints against the health service, said: “The findings of my investigations reveal an attitude – both personal and institutional – which fails to recognise the humanity and individuality of the people concerned and to respond to them with sensitivity, compassion and professionalism.
 “The reasonable expectation that an older person or their family may have of dignified, pain-free end of life care in clean surroundings in hospital is not being fulfilled. Instead, these accounts present a picture of NHS provision that is failing to meet even the most basic standards of care.
“These often harrowing accounts should cause every member of NHS staff who reads this report to pause and ask themselves if any of their patients could suffer in the same way.
“I know from my caseload that in many cases, the answer must be 'yes’.”
Michelle Mitchell, charity director at Age UK, said: “The inhumane treatment of older people described in this report is sickening and should send shock waves through the NHS and Government.
“It’s difficult to imagine us allowing any other group of people to suffer this indignity and neglect, yet we know this is just the tip of the iceberg. Appalling treatment of older people in the health service is far too common.”
Under Labour, health spending in England tripled to reach more than £100  billion a year. A new “NHS Constitution” set out the service’s commitment to human rights, high-quality care and respect for patients and their families.
Yet the Ombudsman said her office’s investigations into the cases of 10 people over 65, which took place between 2009 and last year, showed the “stark contrast” between the NHS’s stated principles and the treatment patients received.
The patients had all been loving, active people of a generation that “didn’t like to make a fuss”. They had simply wanted to be cared for properly and die peacefully – but they all suffered “unnecessary pain, indignity and distress while in the care of the NHS”. As a result, “they were transformed from alert and able individuals to people who were dehydrated, malnourished or unable to communicate”.
Half of them did not consume adequate food or water, some were not washed, others were discharged in a “shambolic” fashion, while in many cases their suffering was ignored.
Nine of the 10 died while in NHS care or soon afterwards, and the Ombudsman upheld the complaints made about the care received by all 10.
The report says it is “incomprehensible” that the NHS needs to be told that its patients should be provided with clean and comfortable surroundings, assistance with eating, drinking water and the ability to call for help. “Yet the most basic of human needs are too often neglected.”
The “harrowing” cases in the report disclose:
• An 82 year-old died alone because staff did not realise her husband had been waiting to see her for three hours;
• A woman was not washed during 13 weeks in hospital, did not have her wound dressings changed and was denied food and drink;
• A woman was discharged from hospital covered in bruises, soaked in urine and wearing someone else’s clothes;
• The life-support system of a heart attack victim was switched off despite his wife asking to leave it on while she contacted the rest of the family.
The Ombudsman warned that the cases detailed in the report were not exceptional, with almost one in five of the 9,000 complaints it received last year concerning the care of older people.
The report notes that by 2034, 23 per cent of the population will be over 65, with rising levels of dementia placing additional burdens on care. But “extra resource alone will not help” as some staff are guilty of an “ignominious failure to look beyond a patient’s clinical condition”, and an “apparent indifference” to “appalling standards of care”.
The Ombudsman said that “real and urgent change” was needed, including listening to older people and their families, as well as learning from mistakes.
Paul Burstow, the care services minister, said: “This report exposes the urgent need to update our NHS. We need a culture where poor practice is challenged and quality is the watchword. The dignity of frail older people should never be sidelined.”
Katherine Murphy, of the Patients Association, said: “Attitudes need to change. Older patients need to be treated with respect and compassion, not as an inconvenience. It is a sick joke that we have an NHS constitution that tells us what rights we have when being treated by the NHS – but it is clear that to the majority of older patients it is not worth the paper it is written on.”
Nigel Edwards, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, said: “It is of course important to put these 10 examples in perspective. The NHS sees over a million people every 36 hours and the overwhelming majority say they receive good care. But I fully appreciate that this will be of little comfort to patients and their families when they have been on the receiving end of poor care.

There was a doctor on the NHS named Harold Shipman who murdered 215 of his patients over a 20 year period using the drug diamorphine. See this web site for more details in this man who was nicknamed Dr. Death as so many of his patients died after being treated by him. He is the worse case, but what is underlying the case is the fact that he was allowed to get away with this for so long.

The people in socialized medicines countries accept that their “free health care” is like this and it is  no use trying to reform the system although each party in power or seeking power promises that they will try to fix the problem.

 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/elderhealth/9343428/Elderly-patients-helped-to-die-to-free-up-beds-warns-doctor.html

Harold Shipman murdered 215 of his patients using the drug diamorphine

http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/articles.aspx?cp-documentid=154159612

Letters written by serial killer Harold Shipman while he was in prison have been made public for the first time.
The doctor murdered 215 of his patients using the drug diamorphine over a period of 20 years.
But he claims no-one saw him do anything in the letters, which are analysed in a BBC One Inside Out programme.
In one letter, he says: "No-one saw me do anything. As for stealing morphine off the terminally ill, again no-one saw me do it."
In another he says: "The police complain I'm boring. No mistresses, home abroad, money in Swiss banks, I'm normal. If that is boring I am."
Psychologist Dr David Holmes says Shipman's letters show he relished the attention of being Britain's most prolific serial killer.
Dr Holmes told the programme: "He saw no-one as being superior to him. In his own mind, in his own eyes, he was some sort of medical god."
Shipman died in January 2004 after hanging himself in his cell at Wakefield Prison in West Yorkshire.
Senior judge Dame Janet Smith led an investigation into the doctor's killing spree and went on to recommend changes to the structure of the General Medical Council, tighter access to controlled drugs and reform of death certification to make it less open to abuse.
But she told the programme she was "disappointed" that key recommendations from her report had not been achieved.