S O U N D   O F F

March 13, 2008

The daliances of Spitzer - Craig - Vitter - Foley - Clinton - Ryan - Hart - collectively, haven't brought near the harm Mr. Al Gore's policy pushing based on his personal CO2 theory. Although given many opportunities to debate global warming (Which in fact the reverse is happening.) with real scientists, Mr. Gore refuses.

Where are the headlines on that? Doesn't ANYONE question the "why his refusal?"

Another example of critical harm facing us: If Gore's friends are successful in getting a Polar bear listed (In spite of scientific facts that clearly state there's absolutely no need to do such.) as endangered, resource production in the U.S. will end. Not only will we run out of gas, we'll run out of food. Which is exactly how nation takeovers are executed.

The differences between Spitzer's sexual intercourse with one and Al Gore's sexual intercourse with millions, are: Spitzer paid his own way and it was consensual. We finance Gore's, and it's not consensual.

Where's the headlines on that?

Reponse
AGREED!!!!! GORE'S HYPOCRICY WILL BANKRUPT EVERY ONE OF US!!!!! PL (NE)