S O U N D   O F F

Dear Elected Officials and Public Officials,

I have no other choice but to continue involving you in Jaden's heartbreaking and dangerous situation. I have tried time and time again to simply report crimes as they happen, to the appropriate agency, and with the sole purpose of protecting Jaden and myself. Without fail, I am met with the most outrageous responses by those who are supposed to protect us. The history of such horrifying treatment has forced me to publicize our very painful and private issues with the goal of increasing the transparency and accountability of those who are responsible for enforcing the laws that are designed to protect my child. Hopefully soon we will succeed in getting Jaden home to safety and on the path to healing. There is so much criminal evidence against Jeffrey R. Pappenheim at this point that the entirety of the people who are watching this case world-wide are dumbfounded by your lack of action. This inaction on your part only reinforces the appearance of political retaliation at my son's expense.

A. Jeffrey R. Pappenheim told Deputy Justin Atwood that he removed Jaden from the state of Colorado in violation of a court order. This evidence was audio recorded by Deputy Atwood. The biological father then lied to Deputy Atwood about taking Jaden out of the state of Colorado in violation of a court order.

1. Is violating a court order a crime? (We have already covered this subject in detail in a previous email.)
2. Is lying to a law enforcement officer about material evidence a crime? Yes, lying to a law enforcement officer, when he asks you a direct question about a possible crime that you have committed, is a crime; there is a statute that covers exactly that and I have seen people charged with that crime for "less serious" lies.

There is probable cause in the two crimes committed by Jeffrey R. Pappenheim (removing Jaden from the state of Colorado and lying to law enforcement officer) listed above:

1. Physical evidence (admission on record to law enforcement)
2. Intent (willful, knowing violation of court order). How do we know it was knowingly and willfully committed? Listen to Deputy Atwood's audio recording and you will hear the lie and why he lied.

B. Jeffrey R. Pappenheim has repeatedly violated a court order throughout the past 106 days by preventing Jaden from seeing his mom and his family and his pets, as ordered by the court.

1. His actions constitute statutorily defined criminal child abuse.
2. His actions constitute statutorily defined criminal domestic violence.
3. Violation of a court order is statutorily defined as a felony crime.

There is probable cause in the three crimes listed above that were committed by Jeffrey R. Pappenheim (child abuse, domestic violence and violation of a court order denying custody exchange):

1. Physical Evidence: law enforcement in three jurisdictions have a record of Jeffrey R. Pappenheim's repeated violations of the court's orders
2. Intent: We have Jeffrey R. Pappenheim's own written and verbal words on record saying he is going to teach Stacy Lynne some lessons. AND, Premeditation proof: We have Jaden on audio record months ago stating that:

--"Mom, I might not see you for a few months."
--"Mom, 'JS' (a horse) isn't very happy because he isn't allowed to travel."
--"Mom, I am going to spend the summer traveling around the country."
--"Mom, I am going to the ocean."

C. Jeffrey R. Pappenheim moved out of the house on the court record listed as Jaden's address without notifying Stacy Lynne and the court within seven (7) days as required. In fact, Jeffrey R. Pappenheim left that address months ago and still has not notified Stacy Lynne or the court of any address change.

There is probable cause in the crime above (violation of court order/failing to notify Stacy and court of change of address):

1. Physical evidence: Officer Bob Ball of the Windsor Police Department confirmed that Jeffrey R. Pappenheim has not lived at the address for months
2. Intent: Jeffrey R. Pappenheim has previously violated this same section of the order in January/February of 2012 and was notified of the violation at that time. This second violation of the same section of the court's order proves that he knows the order and that he willfully and intentionally violated the order again.

Remember our previous emails about civil issues versus crimes versus violations of court orders?

I was arrested on December 21, 2011 FOR NOT VIOLATING A COURT ORDER less than 90 minutes after I went into the courthouse on my own volition to see if there was an order. I was then chased down the sidewalk at the courthouse and was served the same court order that the opposing side (Jeffrey R. Pappenheim) was served by the judge 40 HOURS PRIOR. Remember: the judge issued the order "EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY", served the opposing side the order and then DID NOT SERVE ME THE ORDER. The judge's intentional failure to serve me (we have proof) led to my illegal arrest and illegal jailing and most terrifyingly resulted in Jaden being used as extortion for my release from jail. I was ambushed through collusion.

If law enforcement officers and the district attorney refuse to arrest and bring charges against Jeffrey R. Pappenheim for his blatant, repeated and dangerous violations of the court order and for his multiple provable crimes against Jaden and me, do you wonder why I was arrested for NOT violating the same court order?

Do you wonder why Jeffrey R. Pappenheim is not already in jail?

The law says that violating a civil court order is a felony. The law says that child abuse and domestic violence are crimes. There is probable cause in all of these crimes that Jeffrey R. Pappenheim is willfully, knowingly, and intentionally committing child abuse, domestic violence and continuous violations of a court's orders.

These crimes are not mere civil "contempt" issues. Jeffrey R. Pappenheim is hurting Jaden (child abuse) with his intentional, calculated, and methodical disregard for the court's orders. Jeffrey R. Pappenheim has proven through his actions that he believes law enforcement officers can be lied to without consequences and that law enforcement officers can be fooled by his superficial charm and polite demeanor.

How do we know for sure that violating a "civil" court order is a crime for which a warrant is issued and an arrest can be made in less than two hours?

Watch this and you will see the answer with your own eyes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXWP0OpQtxw.
Dear Elected Officials and Public Officials:

You are receiving this email because it, and the attached letter, serves as verifiable evidence that the abuse against my son is causing heart-wrenching damage to his potential, to his emotional well-being, to his mental health, and to his physical stability.

THIS IS NOT A CUSTODY CASE. THIS IS A CASE OF POLITICAL RETALIATION AND PERSONAL VENGEANCE AND
MY INNOCENT SON IS BEING USED ASTHE WEAPON OF CHOICE AGAINST ME.

I have submitted many records to a "court-ordered interactional assessor". Her job was to watch Jaden and me "interact" for 50 minutes and then she was required to make some kind of official determination for the court. However, the order was so vague that we aren't sure yet what was supposed to be determined. The attached letter has been redacted and after you are finished reading it, you will be able to understand more of the trauma that my son has been enduring for nearly eight months.

Imagine your own young child sitting in a classroom for half of his school year in complete shock. Think about his little hands trying so hard to work but his mind is so scrambled from the trauma of what is happening to him that he can't even remember any basic skills.

Remember the child abuse statute says that even a risk of emotional or mental impairment....The reason that legislators wrote the child abuse statute in that manner is because they, and every healthy parent on this planet, have an inherent understanding of what is required to raise a healthy child.

I wonder how much more evidence you need before you are compelled to take a stand. This is evidence from a third party that I was not even aware of until last week WHEN I WAS FINALLY ALLOWED TO CONTACT MY SON'S SCHOOL. Do you remember why I was banned from participating in my own son's education for the second half of his third grade year???? THERE WAS NO REASON. NONE. THIS IS PURE VINDICTIVENESS ON THE PART OF JULIE FIELD. Vindictive judges who violate the law and their own canons are a disgrace to humanity.

This is not a "child custody" case. This is political retaliation. This is personal vengeance.

Sincerely,

Stacy Lynne