S T O R I E S

Heads up! Chuck just got word from the person who wrote "There's Got To Be A Pony," under the pseudonym "Arem Roder."

In 2003, Chuck established a confidential working relationship with Mr. Roder, in order that we produce his children's story at the National Western Stock Show and Rodeo. Some of you who saw or performed in this "musical equitation production of extreme culture," would remember.

Arem said he's been watching all these lies about global warming and polar bears, and grieves over it. So he decided he wants us to use "Pony" to help stop the lies.

He asked that we assemble (gave us a list) actors, equestrians, musicians and a producer - to bring in Pony as a feature film.
The relevance of Pony? It's about a boy "Emil" and his little sister "Alma", who think they've found a magic saddle. It evolves into a story about good people, "Amicus, Susan, and Grandpa Cerro Nature", versus the evil "Rut Aboot" and his gang of "Earthvexors" thugs.

Rut (patterned after Al Gore), listens only to himself untill his ears grow cupped over his mouth. He wants all the land from sky to sea as far as one can see (and I'm paraphrasing from weak memory).

We must join together and block the lies of Mr. Gore and his "Earthvexor" thugs.

As Grandpa Cerro Nature says, "One small truth can bring down a million big lies."

Roni
970-284-6874

Today, you can help your child learn the facts behind the polar bear scare, by printing off the attached: FIRST SCIENTIFIC FORECAST OF POLAR BEAR POPULATION (March 30, 2008), and read it together. We encourage you to recommend they take a copy to their school, with request their principal do an assembly address on it.

Following is yet another reason why Good Neighbors must produce "There's Got To Be A Pony," by Arem Roder.
We have a duty to neutralize these lies designed fluffy and sweet for play on the emotions of our children.

http://jeandaviesokimoto.com/

Here's what one great neighbor wrote to Mrs. Okimoto regards her polar bear book.

From: Ron Ewart
To: jokim12345@aol.com
Cc: robert@astleliterary.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 9:25 AM
Subject: Propaganda through children

Dear Mrs. Okimoto:

How sad it is that you lend your considerable writing talents to propaganda to children for the radical environmental agenda. Never have so many been so duped by so few, over a natural event that has absolutely nothing to do with man.

In over 3.5 billion years of Earth's history, 99.999% of all species that ever lived are now extinct. Species are going in an out of extinction regularly because all across our planet, environments and eco-systems change constantly and some times dramatically. Those species that can adapt to the changes, survive. Those that don't go extinct. The polar bear population has been increasing, not decreasing. It isn't going extinct because of retreating sea ice. It is a myth. Sea ice in the artic this year has been increasing more rapidly than in many years. As you well know, living on Vashon Island, WA, this Puget Sound winter has been one of the coldest and longest in a 100 years and I have live here for 70 years. It is still cold Jean and it's April 22nd. It snowed here a couple of times just last week, at sea level, in mid-April! Global warming my aunt fanny.

What galls me more than anything else is people like you use children to propagandize a socialist and radical environmental agenda. I taught a science class to 10-year olds last year. One of the students was my grandson. The subject was the weather and I happen to know a lot about the weather, being a pilot. So when I asked the students what four things effected the weather, expecting the sun, ocean currents, humidity or the like, what did I get as the first thing? "global warming". What did I get for the second thing? "man-made pollutants". As young as kindergarten, you people are brainwashing and indoctrinating our next generation with garbage, and books like "Churchill" are aiding and abetting the brainwashing.

Following my signature block is the real story about global warming, as appeared in the Seattle Times a couple of years ago. Take note. Environmentalists look back 100 years. We look back 3.5 billion years. It's a far better sample from which to make judgments, don't you think?



Ron Ewart, President
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RURAL LANDOWNERS