October 8, 2011 | |
Is environmental deception genetic? | |
By Muncelle Mitchell and Dennis Mitchell |
|
t’s an old story and one that the mainstream media has been mostly deaf, dumb and blind to as it has moved through the generations. Ted Kennedy was often referred to as an environmental champion of clean energy. He was the shining knight that paralyzed ANWR drilling, forced C.A.F.E. standards to dizzying heights, and increased funding for cleaning up waterways and similar efforts going back as far as 1972. But, when it came to a wind farm off Cape Cod that might offend the blueblood view, he drove it off a bridge -so to speak. This is the same Ted Kennedy who cheered the Supreme Court’s ruling that cost/benefit was not a factor for EPA to consider in order to ladle out regulations; and the same Ted Kennedy who “fought” for renewable energy subsidies with great “courage”. Now, a family member, Robert Kennedy Jr., is also overwrought that the application of green energy wind farm would place an unfair cost burden on some taxpayers because of ………. drum roll please……. Subsidies! We were always a little confused about Ted Kennedy being referred to as the “lion in the Senate.” There appears to be the possibility that one of those words in that phrase perhaps should have been used as a misspelled verb instead of a reference to a noble beast. Likewise, the younger Kennedy generation is now fighting the same battle of consistency by deception. Many years ago the legend and the facts about RFK, Jr’s zest to become an environmental activist included globetrotting around in large family jets creating a carbon footprint similar to the Great Chicago Fire. Perhaps he was able to afford special dispensation for sins-of-the-environment and render his waste stream purified- a sort of carbon credit without full disclosure.
Dennis and Muncelle are a father/daughter writing team. |
|