July 15, 2013 | |
Audit rips Obama climate science program for money blunders | |
|
|
Last week's release of a scathing 53-page audit report by the Interior Department's top cop has opened up another Obama climate-change snake pit nobody's ever heard of: Landscape Conservation Cooperatives. "We found areas of concern that place millions of dollars at risk. These findings may raise public concern, which could impact support for this valuable work," wrote Deputy Inspector General Mary Kendall, acting inspector general and author of the audit report. Mary Kendall and her team have antagonized the House Committee on Natural Resources by "not pursuing investigations involving political appointees or Administration priorities," and "not issuing reports to Congress and the public." WMI is a scientific and educational nonprofit group founded in 1911 by well-heeled hunters and anglers who promoted protections to restore dwindling fish and game populations. In 1946, WMI began a tradition by hiring Ira Gabrielson, retiring director of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, as its president. Many WMI presidents since then came straight from the FWS director's chair. WMI's presidency became known as the FWS's early retirement double-dipper golden parachute, with current presidential compensation in the $265,000 range. It should come as no surprise, then, that FWS awarded a $2 million cooperative agreement without competition to WMI for scientific advice and to administer the North Atlantic and Appalachian LCC's grants to third parties. Somehow, this glaring favoritism was not put before FWS director Dan Ashe by Kendall's investigators -- or included in the report's 15 recommendations for improvement. However, even if the FWS were to break off this incestuous affair, WMI is also funded by vastly wealthy and uber-connected Big Green foundations such as the Hewlett Foundation ($7.3 billion 2011 assets), which gave WMI a $485,000 grant for "support of the sportsmen advisory group on climate change." (Note how Hewlett grant priorities match Interior Department priorities.) The OIG audit report complained that WMI administered six funding opportunities offered by the Appalachian LCC, none of which were posted on Grants.gov. As a result, there was no public competition, chalked up to inadequate grant management training for LCC personnel. The OIG also questioned WMI's imposition of a 10 percent surcharge on the grants it administered, in the total amount of $182,947. FWS is now working to determine whether payback is required. A congressional source said committee hearings on Landscape Conservation Cooperatives can be expected. Leave your comments at
|
|
comments powered by Disqus | |