June 16, 2014
 

As you know, we have been looking for a way to try to protect property rights against radical groups like the WWP. Today, I think we have found a way. I am attaching a press release for litigation filed by Wyoming Ranchers against WWP for trespass on private property during the collection of range and water quality “data” that is being submitted to federal and state agencies to try to eliminate grazing from the public lands. We are asking not only for actual land damages, but also punitive damages and permanent injunctive relief.

I am really excited about this litigation!

Karen Budd Falen
 

Landowners file trespass lawsuit against
Western Watersheds Project

Contact:

 

The United States and Wyoming Constitutions hold the ownership and protection of private property, including the right to exclude third parties, in the highest regard. Regardless whether your private property is your backyard in town or rangeland in the country, trespassing is illegal.
Fifteen landowners in Fremont County, Wyoming and Lincoln County, Wyoming have filed a civil trespass lawsuit in

Wyoming District Court, Fremont County, against Western Watersheds Project, Inc. (WWP) and Jonathan Ratner, WWP Director for Wyoming, Utah and Colorado, and John Does 1-10 with the Western Watersheds Project, Inc. for intentionally and without landowner permission trespassing and entering private property. The Plaintiffs in the case are seeking a permanent injunction to stop further unauthorized trespass against their private property. The Plaintiffs are also seeking recovery of actual, nominal and punitive damages.

According to Western Watersheds Project, Inc.’s website, “Policy Memo Number 2” is “To Do: Get all cows and sheep off public lands ASAP!” In order to advance the agenda of WWP, the Defendants were willing to break laws by illegally trespassing on private property.

“In many areas in Wyoming, private land is interspersed with federal lands. We (Wyoming private landowners) have typically allowed public access through our private lands,” said Anjie McConnell with Frank Ranches. “Allowing public access is a property owner’s choice.”

“For instance, if you are not comfortable allowing someone into your home you are able to tell them “no” and close the door,” She explained. “Landowners have the same rights and the ability to say “no” to groups and individuals that knowingly trespass; including those trying to advance an agenda against multiple-use of federal lands.”
Trespasses by WWP occurred while collecting and submitting water quality samples to the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Trespasses also occurred while collecting range monitoring data.

According to the lawsuit (Complaint), in June 2005 and May 2010, Ratner, on behalf of WWP, submitted to the DEQ a “Sampling and Analysis Plan” (SAP) for the collection of water quality data. “The signed 2005 SAP and the 2010 SAP affirmatively state that all water quality monitoring will be in compliance with Wyoming’s Credible Data Act of 1999,” wrote Attorney Karen Budd-Falen. “Additionally, the SAP’s state the sampling sites will be on public lands with legal public access.”

According to the Complaint, when the latitude/longitude coordinates for the individual water quality site locations provided by Defendants were placed on a land ownership map, circumstantial evidence shows the Defendants trespassed upon the Plaintiff’s private property.

“Additionally, two of the water monitoring site locations were illegally located on the private lands belonging to two of the Plaintiffs,” She continued.

“Because the Defendants were required to use GPS equipment to note the locations of their water quality monitoring sites, Defendants knew or should have known that they were trespassing on private property to access these sites,” Budd-Falen explained.

“Landowners are not comfortable having an extreme biased organization, that has not demonstrated the professional qualifications to collect credible data, trespassing their lands,” Budd-Falen continued.
Additionally, the Defendant trespassed on State lands and was notified on April 1, 2014 by the Director of the Wyoming Office of State Lands and Investments that collection of monitoring data on Wyoming State trust lands was prohibited by law and that any continued unauthorized data collections may constitute trespassing.
Punitive damages are being sought because of the continued and habitual trespass by the Defendants. The Complaint states: “Punitive damages are proper where there has been an aggravated disregard of another’s rights and where the imposition of punitive damages will tend to prevent this type of violation in the future. In this case, Defendants wilfully and wantonly acted, in reckless disregard for the consequences, and in complete and utter disregard for Plaintiffs’ property rights.”

“It is of great concern to us when an individual or an organization habitually trespasses on our private lands,” McConnell concluded. “It should also be of great concern to all people who own, use and enjoy lands and value open spaces in Wyoming.”

Accessing land without permission is against the law and a violation of the basic rights of property owners. For this reason, the Plaintiffs in this lawsuit have the support of the Wyoming Association of Conservation Districts, Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation, Wyoming Stock Growers Association and Wyoming Wool Growers Association.