ARTICLES: June 17, 2009 | |
|
|
Reality Check On "Real" Schools |
|
© 2009 Beverly K. Eakman | |
Amid 40 years of hand-wringing over nonexistent or, at best, mediocre, gains in student achievement in the nation's public (and even many private) schools, what is most noticeably lost is any concept of what comprises a truly "basic" education. The latest finding from study at Stanford University's Center for Research on Education Outcomes is that even the entity known as "charter schools" falls far short of expectations in comparison with run-of-the-mill, chaotic "traditional" public schools (See hyperlink: Charter schools hit, miss in new report ). Some 37 percent of charter schools even came in below public schools. Many "poor" families, in addition to parents who dissatisfied with the lack of focus on academics in public schools but cannot afford an alternative, have elected to send their children to what they believe is higher-performing charter schools. What they don't realize is that if a school is accepting any sort of federal funding, which always trickles down as state funding as well, then the school environment, as well as the curriculum per se , is going to be pretty much the same -- awash in political correctness, junk science and sex education masquerading as history ("social studies"), scientific method and "health," respectively. In particular, tests will be watered down as "assessments," which are not really tests at all, but opinion research with large doses of mental health screening instruments interspersed among the opinions and occasional academic questions. Many readers have probably seen versions of the following test -- an eighth-grade final exam from 1895 in Salina, Kansas, USA. This particular one was taken from the original document on file at the Smokey Valley Genealogical Society and Library in Salina, KS, and reprinted by the Salina Journal. A similar one was used as an entrance exam for public high schools in New Jersey around the same time. If a student couldn't pass it, then back to elementary school for him or her, or else a low-paying, menial job. So the message was two-fold: (1) success at real academics mattered; and (2) education was, in the end, a privilege, not a "right." Thus, the school environment was infused with strict discipline, in the form of "Yes, Ma'am" and "No, Sir"; appropriate standards of dress and decorum. What follows, then, is an honest-to-goodness test , not a "questionnaire," not an "assessment," not an "instrument." I especially like the first entry under Geography: "What is climate? On what does climate depend?" Our nation's education leaders and policymakers might want to avail themselves of this test as a reality check: 8 TH GRADE FINAL EXAM, 1895
1. Give nine rules for the use of capital letters. Arithmetic (Time: 1 hour, 15 minutes)
hold? 3. If a load of wheat weighs 3,942 lbs., what is it worth at 50 cents/bushel, deducting 1,050 lbs. for tare?
seven months at $50 per month, with $104 for incidentals?
6. Find the interest of $512.60 for 8 months and 18 days at 7 percent.
10. Write an example of a bank check, a Promissory Note, and a receipt. U.S. History (Time: 45 minutes)
letters, linguals.
non, inter, mono, sup.
sound: card, ball, mercy, sir, odd, cell, rise, blood, fare, last.
raze, raise, rays. Write 10 words frequently mispronounced and indicate pronunciation by use of diacritical marks and by syllabication. Geography (Time: one hour)
Helena, Juan Fernandez, Aspinwall and Orinoco. 6. Name and locate the principal trade centers of the U.S.
When this author was interviewed on Pat Buchanan's radio show a few years ago, I brought along a copy of a test like this to make the case that the U.S. was not pursuing real academics. My opposite number, as it were, was a liberal professor, who alleged that (a) the three R's were less relevant in modern times, falling way behind things like teamwork and socialization, and that (b) most people absorbed enough "basics" in the course of things to get by anyway. When I pulled out the test and asked both the guest opponent and Mr. Buchanan (a former Jesuit student and quite learned), to answer these questions, neither man could do it, save for three or four. That was in the 1990s. Today, departments of teacher education are unable to instruct in what constitutes a basic education for any subject. In social studies, for example -- the term itself ought to tell us what is wrong with history, civics and government -- educators have no clue of a connection between national sovereignty, the Declaration of Independence, self-evident truths, inalienable rights (the original version of "human rights"), liberty, private property, and popular sovereignty. So, they can hardly be expected to teach about the Constitution, or to conduct a real examination of the letters that went back and forth between our Constitution's framers, who by these letters hammered out the weaknesses in the forms of government that had been tried up to that time so as to bequeath something different to a fledgling nation. Little wonder, then, that today America is on the path to socialism in earnest, having turned out some 40 years' worth of little socialists who believe not in self-sufficiency or independent action or self-determination, but rather in interdependency, mob action ("teamwork"), government direction and bureaucratic bean-counting. |
|