ARTICLES: September 19, 2013 | |
Why You Cannot Refer to the 9/13/13 "Epic Water Event" as a Flood | |
By Chuck Sylvester |
|
My grandfather always explained,"The Sylvester home is not in the floodplain!" And he was right! He had the wisdom to put the house 4 feet above ground level, and the high water line was several hundred yards north of the house. By approximately 1879, the upper S. Platte was fully adjudicated (Senior users put it to beneficial use through irrigation and canal development.) from its headwaters to the Greeley, CO area. Everything east is Junior and dependent upon Senior for its "artificial flow." The S. Platte River is a "gaining - or artificial stream." It is not a natural stream, as it's dependent on snowpack/precipitation and historically dried near Kersey, CO. Here are some valid reasons why you can't call the 9/13/13 Epic Water Event a flood. a) Man-made unattainable 100% augmentation demands. The combination of these man-made factors along with epic rains in key places contributed to what should be classified as an "Epic Water Event," and not...a flood. |
|
comments powered by Disqus | |