Cattle Industry: December 1, 2008 | |
USDA Memo Mandates NAIS Premises Registration USCA President calls for unity on the issue... | |
For more information, contact: 2008 Karin Bergener at 330-298-0065 Judith McGeary at 512-243-9404 | |
As part of the USDA's ongoing pattern of misleading tactics, the agency and industry organizations are backing away from an internal USDA memo that outlines how to force registration of real estate holding livestock, horses, or poultry under USDAâ?Ts National Animal Identification System (NAIS). The USDA memo, issued on September 22, 2008, dictates the procedure by which state agencies shall register animal owners' properties despite the owners' objections, if the owners refuse to voluntarily register. "The memo not only calls for mandatory registrations, but for branding individuals as 'dissenters,' notes Col. (Ret.) Randy Givens, a founder of the Liberty Ark Coalition (LAC), an alliance formed to fight NAIS. "The USDA's document states that people who refuse to 'voluntarily' register their property will not only be involuntarily assigned a registration number, but will also be assigned a special code that designates their refusal to 'volunteer.' " Under NAIS, the premises registrations are gathered into a massive national database. Individual animals will each be tagged, using mostly microchip devices, and animal owners, even those with pets, will have to report to the government whenever they buy or sell animals, or animals die, or they take the animal off their property for events such as trail rides or shows. Most independent farmers and pet owners of livestock or horses have objected to the extensive costs and government intrusion of the system. Industrial agriculture operations, which will be able to avoid individual tagging by using group identification, support NAIS. USDA's 2005 plan for NAIS called for it to become mandatory by 2009. However, in response to widespread protests by animal owners, USDA announced in 2007 that the program would be "voluntary at the federal level." That change in strategy moved implementation of the mandatory NAIS down to the states, allowing USDA to disclaim responsibility. Since then, many states have been using federal guidelines and funding, under Cooperative Agreements, to implement mandatory or coercive NAIS programs. "This is the usual response; they are denying the plain meaning of the memo," says Judith McGeary, Executive Director of FARFA and herself a small farmer. "In a recent letter, AHC declared that anti-NAIS activists did not understand the memo and that the memo was discussing plans for some unspecified time in the future," says McGeary. "But the memo was issued by the agency, written in the present tense, with no caveats or limitations." | |
Good Neighbor Committee | Good Neighbor Law© 2006 | | |