Cattle Industry: May 27, 2008 | |
NAIS Letter to Secretary Schafer |
|
Charles & Ronita Sylvester Regards: National Animal Identification System (NAIS) and Premise ID. Since about 2004, cow-calf producers have asked the USDA and their respective state ag departments the following questions regards NAIS and Premise ID. While attention is paid to implementation of mandatory animal ID, the cow-calf producers questions remain un-answered. The problems generated from such include: assaults on administrative procedures, intrusion of property rights, discrimination against cow-calf producers, exploitation of children, and usurping of county and states rights. We request your opinion as to whether or not these actions are deserving of investigation by our respective states Attorney Generals, and perhaps our Federal Attorney General. We sincerely plead for your federal directive to stop all animal ID implementation activities until these questions are answered to the full satisfaction and procession that is wholly agreed upon whom-ever burden of said program falls on; which in this case, is the cow-calf producer. A What is the genesis of Animal ID? B What entity first requested Animal ID? C Provide paradigm of NAIS/Premises ID program. D Provide chronology of implementation notifications. E Provide location, specie vote breakouts, transcripts and attendee sign-in G Identify each funding source (Includes government grants.) and amounts contributed. H Are existing brand laws accepted as a recognizable form of ID? Please explain in detail. I Which animals must have ID? Please explain in detail. L Please give chronology of governing bodies, i.e. who answers to who? M Identify all jurisdictions and entities having authority to enforce voluntary ID, and O Define authorities County Commissioners, Legislators, Governors and Federal P Define authorities or responsibilities Brand Inspectors and State Veterinarians may Q Who determines information to be collected, and how it will be managed thereon? R Who pays for ID devices? S Who is responsible for installation and costs involved? U In case of disease outbreak, define: Vaccine readiness, preparedness to deal with mortality if in event vaccine doesn’t arrive timely, and compensation. V Does party burdened with cost of purchase and installation of devices get to do comparative shopping and choose product? If not, explain why. W Please show me the law, that may or may not back implementation of animal ID. To reiterate Secretary Schafer, we sincerely plead for your federal directive to stop all animal ID implementation activities until these questions are answered to the full satisfaction and procession that is wholly agreed upon whom-ever burden of said program falls on; which in this case, is the cow-calf producer. We look forward to hearing from you. Thank you. Sincerely, Chuck & Roni Sylvester USDA response to Chuck & Roni Sylvester regards NAIS. |
|
Good Neighbor Committee | Good Neighbor Law© 2006 | |
|